Listen to the episode on your favorite platforms:
In this episode I debunk the recurring media claim that your zodiac sign has changed by explaining the 2,000-year history of why western astrologers have deliberately used the tropical zodiac.
Every few years, headlines circulate claiming that your zodiac sign has changed due to the precession of the equinoxes. Following a recent New York Times article making this claim, I decided to set the record straight.
In this episode of The Astrology Podcast, I explain the history behind this recurring narrative and demonstrate why these claims are misleading. We'll explore the difference between the three zodiacs (constellational, sidereal, and tropical) and show how Western astrologers, starting with Claudius Ptolemy nearly 2,000 years ago, made a deliberate and conscious choice to use the tropical zodiac, which is aligned with the seasons, not the constellations.
This is not a recent mistake or discovery; it's a foundational principle of the Western astrological tradition that has been understood for centuries by history's most prominent astrologers and astronomers. We will also touch on the issue of the so-called 13th sign, Ophiuchus, and why it doesn't apply to the system most Western astrologers use.
My goal is to clarify the history so that you can better understand why your zodiac sign has not changed and feel more equipped to respond to these arguments.
This is episode 509 of The Astrology Podcast.
Timestamps
- Introduction - Recent New York Times Article - A Common Narrative That Goes Viral Every Few Years - The Five Main Talking Points in Anti-Astrology Articles - The Fundamental Problem & Rhetorical Goal of These Articles - Explaining the Three Zodiacs - The Origin of the Zodiac - The First Zodiac: The Constellational Zodiac - The Second Zodiac: The Sidereal Zodiac - The Foundation of Western Astrology in Hellenistic Egypt - How Planetary Rulers Were Assigned to Signs Based on the Seasons - The Third Zodiac: The Tropical Zodiac - The Discovery of Precession by Hipparchus - Ptolemy's Deliberate Choice to Use the Tropical Zodiac - The Source of Confusion: Using Constellation Names for Tropical Signs - How Ptolemy's Influence Cemented the Tropical Zodiac in the West - Historical Aside: Why Indian Astrology Uses the Sidereal Zodiac - Famous Astronomers Deliberately Used the Tropical Zodiac - Why the "Astrologers Made a Mistake" Argument is Flawed - Rebuttal: Your Zodiac Sign Has Not Changed - Rebuttal: The Ophiuchus "13th Sign" Argument - The Underlying Goal of Skeptical Articles - The Legitimate Internal Debate Among Astrologers - Conclusion and Final Thoughts - End cards
Watch the Video Version of This Episode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KPfvsYPv9I
-
Listen to the Audio Version of This Episode
Listen to the audio version of this episode or download it as an MP3:
Every few years, headlines circulate claiming that your zodiac sign has changed due to the precession of the equinoxes. Following a recent New York Times article making this claim, I decided to set the record straight.
In this episode of The Astrology Podcast, I explain the history behind this recurring narrative and demonstrate why these claims are misleading. We'll explore the difference between the three zodiacs (constellational, sidereal, and tropical) and show how Western astrologers, starting with Claudius Ptolemy nearly 2,000 years ago, made a deliberate and conscious choice to use the tropical zodiac, which is aligned with the seasons, not the constellations.
This is not a recent mistake or discovery; it's a foundational principle of the Western astrological tradition that has been understood for centuries by history's most prominent astrologers and astronomers. We will also touch on the issue of the so-called 13th sign, Ophiuchus, and why it doesn't apply to the system most Western astrologers use.
My goal is to clarify the history so that you can better understand why your zodiac sign has not changed and feel more equipped to respond to these arguments.
This is episode 509 of The Astrology Podcast.
Timestamps
- Introduction - Recent New York Times Article - A Common Narrative That Goes Viral Every Few Years - The Five Main Talking Points in Anti-Astrology Articles - The Fundamental Problem & Rhetorical Goal of These Articles - Explaining the Three Zodiacs - The Origin of the Zodiac - The First Zodiac: The Constellational Zodiac - The Second Zodiac: The Sidereal Zodiac - The Foundation of Western Astrology in Hellenistic Egypt - How Planetary Rulers Were Assigned to Signs Based on the Seasons - The Third Zodiac: The Tropical Zodiac - The Discovery of Precession by Hipparchus - Ptolemy's Deliberate Choice to Use the Tropical Zodiac - The Source of Confusion: Using Constellation Names for Tropical Signs - How Ptolemy's Influence Cemented the Tropical Zodiac in the West - Historical Aside: Why Indian Astrology Uses the Sidereal Zodiac - Famous Astronomers Deliberately Used the Tropical Zodiac - Why the "Astrologers Made a Mistake" Argument is Flawed - Rebuttal: Your Zodiac Sign Has Not Changed - Rebuttal: The Ophiuchus "13th Sign" Argument - The Underlying Goal of Skeptical Articles - The Legitimate Internal Debate Among Astrologers - Conclusion and Final Thoughts - End cards
Watch the Video Version of This Episode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KPfvsYPv9I
-
Listen to the Audio Version of This Episode
Listen to the audio version of this episode or download it as an MP3:
Smart linkhttps://pc.st/e/0QMoUx81-RW
Official sitehttps://theastrologypodcast.com/
Auto-openhttps://pc.st/e/0QMoUx81-RW?a
Add podcast to the siteEmbed Podcast